Sunday, June 8, 2014

How do you like Kakuma?

Often I am asked by those I've interviewed "how do you like Kakuma?" I find the question deserves more than a cursory "it's been very good so far," or "I like it very much." This is not what those who pose the question are looking for. Nor is it the truth. Which isn't to say the exact opposite, that Kakuma "has been awful" or "I hate it here."

I invite a far lengthier discussion when I say I think that Kakuma has many dimensions. That I daily meet and hear from extraordinary people and have been shown tremendous kindness and hospitality. I say that there is so much to admire and enjoy here--Ethiopian restaurants where you can while hours away in shady courtyards smoking hookah and eating injera; motorbike taxis that drop you off (and pick you up) throughout the camp; Internet cafés and booming marketplaces--even an ATM.

But then you get off the main streets or out into the far camps--Kakuma 3 and 4 or the "new area" (somewhat of a misnomer as it's been new for over one year). On these windswept expanses you'll see images far more commonly associated with the term "refugee." Naked children with distended bellies, dilapidated tents, scores of people lying for hours under knarled thorn trees, waiting for the hours to pass by.

I've spoken with some of them, though they are usually too tired or too weary of the mzungu to tell their story. Yesterday, I met with a fifteen year old girl from South Sudan who is four months pregnant and for four years has been the only caregiver for her brother (he's now ten). They have no parents, no extended family to rely on. She has dropped out of school. He is still attending, but says he needs to work. Otherwise they will continue to go hungry, as their two week food ration  barely lasts more than one week.

I ask if child protection, a unit of Lutheran World Federation (LWF) has come to see them. They say it has been two years. I take down their names and ration card numbers (the primary form of ID for refugees in the camp) and say I will give their information to child protection but cannot promise they will come by to see them. I feel an impotence commingled with shame and regret, but know I cannot promise more.

When I follow-up with a friend in the Child Protection Office, she is livid that no one has been to see these children in two years. Livid, but not surprised. We have spoken at length of the shortcomings of her office. Not for want of resources or personnel, Child Protection is crippled by the indifference if not apathy of many staff members. This, coupled with a lack of coordination with other units (most notably the education unit) or agencies, renders tens of thousands of children without the services to which they are entitled and desperately need (more on this in an upcoming post).

Hours later, in an air conditioned house in the UNHCR compound, I overheard one staff member ask another "how do you find Kakuma?" Without missing a beat, she replied that she loved it. I smiled politely and  for a moment held to the image of the fifteen year old girl before returning to my roasted eggplant, feta cheese, and couscous  dinner and opening another cold bottle of beer. 

Friday, June 6, 2014

Boundaries

There are no fences around Kakuma camp, but the borders are not porous. Refugees are kept in, researchers mostly kept out--save for a small handful who are commissioned by the UNHCR or one of its implementing partners, or who through luck and perseverance figure out how to navigate the system. I'm of the later, staying with the Lutheran World Federation (the UNHCR's main implementing partner for education); but I'm not here "with" the LWF.

Just over one week ago, I arrived by plane to Lodwar, an outpost town of approximately 4000 (predominately Turkanas). These indigenous peoples look similar in dress and appearance to the more widely known Massai, but do not inspire the same awe amongst tourists (perhaps because so few ever come to this barren, desert region where it rains only 15 days per year).

Lodwar is 120 kilometers from Kakuma and I was advised (by the journalists and scholars mentioned in a previous post), that I could either arrange for a cab or see if I could catch a ride with one of the NGO's I would find waiting outside the landing strip (row after row of shiny SUV's with alphabet soup logos fixed prominently on the driver and passenger doors--WFP, CARE, JRS, LWF, NCCK...)

I managed to get a seat in LWF's truck and pondered how I might manage to stay in their compound as we raced off-road towards Kakuma. We were off road (on the dirt track next to the road) because even the SUV couldn't tackle the cracked and potholed Tarmac, and racing because bandits have been known to target the NGO caravans that regularly pass through. I was pondering because if I didn't get into the compound, I would be staying outside the camp in Kakuma town at one of the two guesthouses (close in distance but far removed from access to refugees and implementing partner staff).

As we approached Kakuma, alphabet soup signs welcomed those who entered. My favorite was the IRC's: WELCOME TO KAKUMA. PLEASE LEAVE THE CAMP BETTER THAN YOU FOUND IT. Behind the sign, goats foraged amongst a pile of trash and a dirt devil (mini tornado) stirred--sending empty water bottles and wrappers flying.

We pulled into the compound and I was directed to the main office. After showing my letter of permission from the DRA and making apologies for arriving unannounced, I managed to get a room in their guesthouse (awestruck after I was deposited there with my bags that transportation and accommodation worked out seamlessly).

So I was "in" and since then have captured story after story of those who desperately want to get out. Despite their education, their livelihoods in a booming informal economy, their connections via Internet and phone to family and friends in far away places, all have said this place is a prison and they are not free.